My Liberty NOW

your source for liberty news.

Iowa Caucus: Anti-Paul storm hits Internet

with 4 comments

On the day of the first caucus of our nation’s primary election, the internet is exploding with anti-Ron Paul articles. Virtually all of these criticize Paul for his radical ideas, some saying his proposals about the economy would worsen the situation, rather than better it. Santorum is calling Paul disgusting. Even Donald Trump is weighing in against Dr. Paul. What many of these articles lack, of course, is a rational explanation as to why Paul’s ideas would fail, and even less likely to offer an alternative.

Doesn’t it make you wonder, though, if Ron Paul is ignorantly promoting big-business interests…why the hell don’t they back him? If Paul would do nothing but widen the gap between the rich and the poor, and foot the middle class with the bill, why doesn’t he get more air time on Fox News and the debates? Something doesn’t add up.

Ron Paul’s principles would increase competition in the market. That means profits become more difficult to obtain, and maintain. But most importantly, Ron Paul’s policies would bar businesses from dumping their expense (externalities) on the taxpayer,such as: government-subsided construction of private assets, government bail-outs, and government buyouts of toxic private assets. Baring corporations from these threaten profits by taking away corporations’ usual strategy to minimize costs (thereby increase profit) through tax money. Your money.

The argument of Austrian Economics in light of our sound-byte, gossip news falls on deft ears of the masses — but not the establishment. They get it. They fear it. They give millions in advertising to the media companies. If Ron Paul truly was a champion of corporate interest, they wouldn’t be relying on 18-year-olds to make YouTube videos to promote Paul’s agenda. Think about it.


Written by Jonathan Mark

January 3, 2012 at 9:04 am

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Think you are simply wrong about why big business is not backing Paul. First most big businesses back all the major contenders, and if Ron shows (unlike in the past elections) that he has a reasonable shot at the white house he will get plenty of support. The thing with Paul is that his ideas are NOT nebulous unformed soundbites. They are concrete and if he wants to accomplish any of them he will have to sell them to congress which has over the last 10 years has been shown to be broken. What good is an idea that has no possibility of becoming reality? If Ron gets elected virtually everyone knows that it will be 4 years of political stagnation with none of Paul’s ideas getting through.


    January 3, 2012 at 12:20 pm

  2. Austrian Economics addresses only the boom/bust cycle. Not interest. And that’s the real problem.
    The federal government is paying 700 billion per year in debt service alone. That’s 5% of GDP that needs to be raked in via the IRS.

    We could have interest free currency, instead of Gold.

    Anthony Migchels

    January 5, 2012 at 10:54 am

    • Your anti-Semitic slant on the matter is needless and shameful. If you want to talk money, then talk money.

      Jonathan (branflakesjack)

      January 8, 2012 at 12:22 pm

  3. Oops, sorry, I understand.

    here’s a more neutral discussion of the issue:
    Discussing Gold and Interest with the Daily Bell

    Anthony Migchels

    January 8, 2012 at 1:41 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: